jgsimbad on 26-Nov-2021 22:04:33 GMT about HD 56035
HD 56035 is not OL 195 AB, there seems to have been a longterm error in double star catalogues.
OL 195 AB is in fact TYC 168 2497 1
This also applies to the WDS J07155+0313AB identifier, which as HD 56035 is not that object either, it is again the Tyc object.
HD 56035 appears not to be a double as there is nothing in GAIA EDR3 nor CMC14/15 nor 1 arsec digital resolution online images from modern surveys to show a companion. However, this negative information is problematic as a roughly 3 arcseconds separation and a differential magnitude of around 2 or more when combined to HD 56035 being bright enough to be overexposed in all of the surveys of decent resolution has some potential for being the cause of said negative result.
Services
Others
Sesame name resolver
Dictionary of nomenclature
Contact us
Help
View annotation on HD 56035 object