getannotation({"annotations":[{"id":1784,"username":"bskiff","context":"vizierTable","element":"J/MNRAS/397/1073/table3","creationDate":1315855115000,"parentId":-1,"isAdmin":"false","isPrivate":"false","text":"     The main data table contains large numbers of pairs\r\nof entries for the same stars.  They are separated by ~1\"\r\nand have similar but not identical photometry, based on\r\ndifferent images in the dataset, which were obviously not\r\nwell linked astrometrically.\r\n     Analysis of the results should also take note of the\r\ntransformation equations 1 to 5 in the paper, notably the\r\nlarge (~0.055 mag) zero-point uncertainties, and the\r\nanomalously low V-band extinction coefficient.  Such problems\r\nare not uncommon with single-night photometry.\r\n\r\n\\Brian Skiff\r\n","parsedText":"     The main data table contains large numbers of pairs\u003cbr /\u003eof entries for the same stars.  They are separated by ~1\u0026quot;\u003cbr /\u003eand have similar but not identical photometry, based on\u003cbr /\u003edifferent images in the dataset, which were obviously not\u003cbr /\u003ewell linked astrometrically.\u003cbr /\u003e     Analysis of the results should also take note of the\u003cbr /\u003etransformation equations 1 to 5 in the paper, notably the\u003cbr /\u003elarge (~0.055 mag) zero-point uncertainties, and the\u003cbr /\u003eanomalously low V-band extinction coefficient.  Such problems\u003cbr /\u003eare not uncommon with single-night photometry.\u003cbr /\u003e\u003cbr /\u003e\\Brian Skiff\u003cbr /\u003e","adminText":"","type":"comment"}],"requestedCatalogue":"J/MNRAS/397/1073"})