bergeat on 06-May-2012 09:41:10 GMT about CGCS 103
V=13.4 is quoted in SIMBAD for this carbon star (CGCS 103): this is wrong,
presumably due to confusion with (IR) i=13.4 in Alksnis+(2001). From data in
VizieR and my analysis, V=17.2 would be more appropriate.
Services
Others
Sesame name resolver
Dictionary of nomenclature
Contact us
Help
View annotation on CGCS 103 object